Al-Fawz al-Kabir fi Usul al-Tafsir

al fawz al kabir fi usul al tafsir

Page 96

إِذَا

When

وَقَعَتِ

befalls

الْوَاقِعَةُ

the Event

When the Event befalls

إِلَى

to

قَوْلِهِ

His saying

تَعَالَى

Most High

to His saying, Most High:

وَكُنْتُمْ

And you will be

أَزْوَاجًا

categories

ثَلَاثَةً

three

And you will be three categories.

حَتَّى

Until

إِذَا

when

جَاءُوهَا

they reach it

فُتِحَتْ

will be opened

أَبْوَابُهَا

its gates

Until, when they reach it and its gates are opened

وَلِيُمَحِّصَ

And that He may purify

اللَّهُ

Allah

الَّذِينَ

those who

آمَنُوا

believed

And that Allah may purify those who believe

فَاءُ

The Fa

الِاتِّصَالِ

of connection

The Fa of Connection:

كَذَلِكَ

Likewise

الْفَاءُ

the Fa

أَيْضًا

also

زَائِدَةٌ

is extra

لِتَأْكِيدِ

for emphasizing

الِاتِّصَالِ

the connection

Likewise, the Fa is also extra (to emphasize connection):

قَالَ

Said

الْقَسْطَلَانِيُّ

Al-Qastalani

فِي

in

شَرْحِ

the commentary of

كِتَابِ

the Book of

الْحَجِّ

Hajj

فِي

in

بَابِ

the chapter of

الْمُعْتَمِرِ

'The Umrah performer'

إِذَا

when

طَافَ

he performs Tawaf

طَوَافَ

of Tawaf

الْعُمْرَةِ

Umrah

ثُمَّ

then

خَرَجَ

he goes out

هَلْ

does

يُجْزِيهِ

it suffice him

مِنْ

from

طَوَافِ

Tawaf

الْوَدَاعِ

of farewell

Al-Qastalani said in the commentary of the Book of Hajj in the chapter "The Umrah performer when he performs the Tawaf of Umrah then goes out, does it suffice him from the farewell Tawaf":

وَيَجُوزُ

And it is permissible

تَوَسُّطُ

the intervention of

الْعَاطِفِ

the conjunction

بَيْنَ

between

الصِّفَةِ

the adjective

وَالْمَوْصُوفِ

and the described

And it is permissible for the conjunction to intervene between the adjective and the described

لِتَأْكِيدِ

to emphasize

لُصُوقِهَا

its adherence

بِالْمَوْصُوفِ

to the described

to emphasize its close adherence to the described

نَحْوُ

such as

such as:

إِذْ
When
يَقُولُ
says
الْمُنَافِقُونَ
the hypocrites
وَالَّذِينَ
and those who
فِي
in
قُلُوبِهِمْ
their hearts
مَرَضٌ
is disease

When the hypocrites and those in whose hearts is disease say

قَالَ

Said

سِيبَوَيْهِ

Sibawayh

Sibawayh said:

هُوَ
It
مِثْلُ
is like
مَرَرْتُ
I passed
بِزَيْدٍ
by Zayd
وَصَاحِبِكَ
and your companion

"It is like 'I passed by Zayd and your companion'"

إِذَا

when

أَرَدْتَ

you intended

بِصَاحِبِكَ

by your companion

زَيْدًا

Zayd

when you intend Zayd by your companion.

وَقَالَ

And said

الزَّمَخْشَرِيُّ

Al-Zamakhshari

فِي

regarding

قَوْلِهِ

His saying

تَعَالَى

Most High

And Al-Zamakhshari said regarding His saying, Most High:

وَمَا
And not
أَهْلَكْنَا
did We destroy
مِنْ
any
قَرْيَةٍ
town
إِلَّا
except
وَلَهَا
and it had
كِتَابٌ
a decree
مَعْلُومٌ
known

"And We did not destroy any town except that it had a known decree."

جُمْلَةٌ

A sentence

وَاقِعَةٌ

occurring

صِفَةً

as an adjective

لِقَرْيَةٍ

for a town

A sentence occurring as an adjective for a town.

وَالْقِيَاسُ

And the standard rule

أَنْ

is that

لَا

not

تَتَوَسَّطَ

intervene

الْوَاوُ

the Waw

بَيْنَهُمَا

between them

And the standard rule is that the Waw does not intervene between them

كَمَا

as

فِي

in

قَوْلِهِ

His saying

تَعَالَى

Most High

as in His saying, Most High:

وَمَا
And not
أَهْلَكْنَا
did We destroy
مِنْ
any
قَرْيَةٍ
town
إِلَّا
except
لَهَا
it had
مُنْذِرُونَ
warners

"And We did not destroy any town except it had warners."

إِنَّمَا

Rather

تَوَسَّطَتْ

it intervened

لِتَأْكِيدِ

to emphasize

لُصُوقِ

the adherence of

الصِّفَةِ

the adjective

بِالْمَوْصُوفِ

to the described

It only intervened to emphasize the close adherence of the adjective to the described.

كَمَا

as

يُقَالُ

it is said

فِي

in

الْحَالِ

the circumstantial clause

As it is said in the circumstantial clause:

جَاءَنِي
Came to me
زَيْدٌ
Zayd
عَلَيْهِ
upon him
ثَوْبٌ
is a garment

"Zayd came to me [while] upon him is a garment"

وَجَاءَنِي
and came to me
وَعَلَيْهِ
and upon him
ثَوْبٌ
is a garment

"and [Zayd] came to me [while] upon him is a garment"