ٱلْقُرْآنُthe Quran::﴿(وَandنَزَّلْنَاWe sent downعَلَيْكَto youٱلْكِتَٰبَthe bookتُبَيِّنَاexplainsلِكُلِّfor everyشَيْءٍthing﴾)[النَّحْلِ(An-Nahl)::٨٩89];];فَإِذَاSo ifكَانَit isتَبْيَانًan explanation؛;فَهُوَthen it isدَلِيلٌa proofقَائِمٌestablishedبِنَفْسِهِby itself،,وَٱنتِفَاءُand the negation ofالدَّلِيلِthe proofٱلْمُعَيَّنِthe specific؛;لَاdoes notيَلْزَمُfollow fromمِنْهُitانْتِفَاءُnegationٱلْمَدْلُولِthe indicated؛;لِأَنَّbecauseٱلْمَدْلُولُthe indicated thingقَدْmightيَكُونُbeلَهُfor itأَدِلَّةٌproofsمُتَعَدِّدَةٌmultiple؛;سَوَاءًwhetherٱلْحَسِّيَاتِthe physicalأوorٱلْمَعْنَوِيَّاتِthe moral::فَSoٱلْحَسِّيَاتُthe physical proofمِثْلَlikeبَلَدٍa countryلَهُfor itعَدَّةُmanyطُرُقٍwaysتُوَصِّلُlead toإِلَيْهِto it؛;فَإِذَاSo ifانْسَدَّone is blockedطَرِيقٌa way؛;ذَهَبْنَاwe goمَعَwithٱلطَّرِيقِthe wayٱلثَّانِيsecond؛;أمَّاAs forٱلْمَعْنَوِيَّاتِthe moral proofs؛;فَكَمْhow manyمِنْofحُكْمٍa rulingواحِدٍoneيَكُونُareلَهُfor itعَدَّةُmultipleأَدِلَّةٍproofs!!وُجُوبُThe obligation ofٱلطَّهَارَةِpurityلِلصَّلَاةِfor prayerمَثَلًاfor exampleفِيهِin itأَدِلَّةٌproofsمُتَعَدِّدَةٌmultiple..فَإِذَنْThus؛;إِذَاifقُلْتُمْyou said::إنَّthatٱلْعَقْلَthe mindلَاdoes notيَدُلُّindicateعَلَىonإِثْبَاتِthe proofٱلْمَحَبَّةِof loveبَيْنَbetweenٱلْخَالِقِthe creatorوَٱلْمَخْلُوقِand the created؛;فَإنَّthen indeedٱلسَّمْعَthe hearingدَلَّindicatedعَلَيْهِto itبِأَجْلَىwith the clearestدَلِيلٍproofوَأَوْضَحَand most clearبَيَانٍexplanation..ٱلْجَوَابُThe answerٱلثَّانِيsecond::ٱلْمَنْعُthe prohibitionأَنْto allowنَمْنَعَwe preventدَعْوَىthe claimأَنَّthatٱلْعَقْلَthe mindلَاdoes notيَدُلُّindicateعَلَيْهَاon it،,وَنَقُولُand we say::بَلْbutٱلْعَقْلَthe mindدَلَّhas indicatedعَلَىonإِثْبَاتِthe proofٱلْمَحَبَّةِof loveبَيْنَbetweenٱلْخَالِقِthe creatorوَٱلْمَخْلُوقِand the created؛;كَمَاasسَبَقَpreviously stated؛;وَأَمَّاAs forقَوْلُكُمْyour statementإنَّthatٱلْمَحَبَّةَthe loveلَاnotتَكُونُbeإِلَّاexceptبَيْنَbetweenمُتَجانِسَيْنِsimilar beings؛;فَيَكْفِيit sufficesأَنْthatنَقُولَwe say::لَاnoقَبُولٍacceptanceلِدَعْوَاكُمْto your claimsلِأَنَّbecauseٱلْمَنْعَthe prohibitionكَافٍsufficientفِيinرَدِّrefutingٱلْحُجَّةِthe argument؛;إذْasإنَّthatٱلْأَصْلَthe principleعَدَمُthe non-existenceٱلثُّبُوتِof the establishment؛;فَنَقُولُwe say::دَعْوَاكُمْyour claimsأَنَّهَاthat theyلَاnotتَكُونُcan beإِلَّاexceptبَيْنَbetweenمُتَجانِسَيْنِsimilar beingsمَمْنُوعٌforbidden،,بَلْbutهِيَitتَكُونُisبَيْنَbetweenغَيْرِnot similarٱلْمُتَجانِسِينَsimilar beings؛;فَالْإِنْسَانُthe humanعِندَهُhasسَاعَةًan old clockقَدِيمَةًoldمَاnotأَتْعَبَتْهُhas troubled himبِالصِّيَانَةِin maintenanceوَمَاand notفَسَدَتْhas ruinedعَلَيْهِon himقَطُّnever..فَتَجِدُهُThen you find himيُحِبُّهَاloves it,,وَعَلَيْهِand hasسَاعَةًa clockتَأْخُذُtakesمِنْهُfrom himنِصْفَhalfوَقْتِهِof his timeفِيinٱلتَّصْلِيحِrepairفَتَجِدُهُThen you find himيُبْغِضُهَاhates itوَأَيْضًاAnd alsoنَجِدُwe findأَنَّthatٱلْبَهَائِمَanimalsتُحِبُّloveوَتُحِبُّand love..٢٤٧247
The Quran: "And We sent down to you the Book that explains everything." (An-Nahl: 89); so if it is an explanation; then it is a proof in itself, and the negation of the specific proof does not imply the negation of the indicated; because the indicated may have multiple proofs; whether physical or moral: Physical proofs are like a country that has several ways to reach it; if one way is blocked, we go with the second way. As for the moral proofs; how many single ruling can have multiple proofs! The obligation of purity for prayer, for example, has multiple proofs. Thus, if you said: that reason does not indicate the proof of love between the creator and the created; then the hearing has indicated it with the clearest proof and most clear explanation. The second answer: the prohibition that we may not accept the claim that reason does not indicate it, and we say: but reason has indicated the proof of love between the creator and the created; as previously stated. As for your saying that love only exists between similar beings; it suffices us to say: there is no acceptance of your claims because the prohibition is sufficient to refute the argument; since the origin of non-existence; we say: your claim that it only exists between similar beings is forbidden, rather it exists between dissimilar beings; for example, a person has an old clock that has not troubled him with maintenance and has never been ruined, he loves it; and he has a clock that takes half his time in repairs, he hates it. And also we find that animals love and are loved.