وَيَتَمَسَّكُ
And he holds fastبِمَا
to whatيَظْهَرُ
appearsمِن
fromدَلَالَتِهَا
its indication,And he holds fast to what appears from its indication,
سَوَاءٌ
whetherخَالَفَ
it opposedمَذْهَبَهُ
his school of thoughtأَوْ
orوَافَقَهُ.
agreed with it.whether it opposed his school of thought or agreed with it.
وَيَلْزَمُ
And it is necessaryأَنْ
thatيَفْهَمَ
he understandsلُغَةَ
the language ofالْقُرْآنِ
the Quranالْكَرِيمِ
the NobleAnd it is necessary that he understands the language of the Noble Quran
عَنْ
throughطَرِيقِ
the way ofاسْتِعْمَالَاتِ
usages ofالْعَرَبِ
the Arabsالْأَوَّلِينَ
the early onesوَتَعْبِيرَاتِهِمْ،
and their expressions,through the usages of the early Arabs and their expressions,
وَأَنْ
and thatيَعْتَمِدَ
he relies- كُلِّيًا -
- completely -عَلَى
uponآثَارِ
the traditions ofالصَّحَابَةِ
the Companionsوَالتَّابِعِينَ
and the Successors- رَضِيَ
- may be pleasedاللَّهُ
Allahعَنْهُمْ -.
with them -.and that he relies - completely - upon the traditions of the Companions and the Successors - may Allah be pleased with them -.
[تَدَافُعٌ
[A conflictفِي
inنَحْوِ
the grammar ofالْقُرْآنِ:]
the Quran:][Conflict in the grammar of the Quran:]
وَقَدْ
And indeedوَقَعَ
has occurredخَلَلٌ
a flawعَجِيبٌ
strangeوَتَدَافُعٌ
and a conflictفِي
inنَحْوِ
the grammar ofالْقُرْآنِ
the Quranالْكَرِيمِ،
the Noble,And indeed a strange flaw and conflict has occurred in the grammar of the Noble Quran,
وَهُوَ
and it isأَنَّ
thatطَائِفَةً
a groupمِنَ
fromالْمُفَسِّرِينَ
the commentatorsاخْتَارُوا
choseمَذْهَبَ
the school ofسِيبَوَيْهِ،
Sibawayh,and it is that a group from the commentators chose the school of Sibawayh,
فَيُؤَوِّلُونَ
so they interpretكُلَّ
everyمَا
whatخَالَفَ
opposedمَذْهَبَهُ
his schoolمَهْمَا
no matter howكَانَ
wasالتَّأْوِيلُ
the interpretationبَعِيدًا
far-fetchedغَيْرَ
unacceptableمُسْتَسَاغٍ،
and unpalatable,so they interpret every what opposed his school no matter how far-fetched and unpalatable the interpretation was,
وَهَذَا
and thisلَا
notيَصِحُّ
is correctعِنْدِي،
in my view,and this is not correct in my view,
بَلْ
ratherيَجِبُ
it is obligatoryالْأَخْذُ
to takeبِالْأَوْلَى
by what is more deservingوَالْأَوْفَقِ
and more appropriateبِالسِّيَاقِ
to the contextrather it is obligatory to take what is more deserving and more appropriate to the context
سَوَاءٌ
whetherوَافَقَ
it agreed withمَذْهَبَ
the school ofسِيبَوَيْهِ
Sibawayhأَوْ
orمَذْهَبَ
the school ofالْفَرَّاءِ.
al-Farra'.whether it agreed with the school of Sibawayh or the school of al-Farra'.
إِعْرَابُ
The parsing of"الْمُقِيمِينَ
"Al-Muqiminالصَّلَاةَ":
As-Salah":The parsing of "Al-Muqimin As-Salah":
وَقَدْ
And indeedقَالَ
saidعُثْمَانُ
Uthman- رَضِيَ
- may be pleasedاللَّهُ
Allahعَنْهُ -
with him -فِي
regardingمِثْلِ
likeقَوْلِ
the statement of- تَعَالَى -
- the Most High -And indeed Uthman - may Allah be pleased with him - said regarding something like the statement of - the Most High -
{وَالْمُقِيمِينَ
{"And those who establishالصَّلَاةَ
prayerوَالْمُؤْتُونَ
and those who giveزَكَاةَ}
zakah}سَتُقِيمُهَا
The Arabs will straighten itالْعَرَبُ
Arabsبِأَلْسِنَتِهَا.
with their tongues.{"And those who establish prayer and those who give zakah} The Arabs will straighten it with their tongues.
وَتَحْقِيقُ
And verification ofهَذِهِ
thisالْكَلِمَةِ
wordعِنْدِي
in my viewأَنَّ
is thatمَا
whatيُخَالِفُ
opposesالتَّرَاكِيبَ
the general structuresالْعَامَّةَ
generalلِلْكَلَامِ،
of speech,And verification of this word in my view is that what opposes the general structures of speech,
وَيَرِدُ
and occursفِي
inكَلَامِ
the speech ofأَهْلِ
the people ofاللُّغَةِ
the languageالَّذِينَ
whoيُحْتَجُّ
are taken as authorityبِهِ
by themفَهُوَ
then it isمِنَ
fromالتَّرَاكِيبِ
the structuresالْمَقْبُولَةِ
acceptedالصَّحِيحَةِ،
and correct,and occurs in the speech of the people of the language who are taken as authority by them, then it is from the accepted and correct structures,
وَكَثِيرًا
and oftenمَا
whatوَقَعَ
occurredلِلْعَرَبِ
for the Arabsالْأَوَّلِينَ
the early onesأَثْنَاءَ
duringخُطَبِهِمْ
their speechesكَلِمَاتٌ
wordsوَتَرَاكِيبُ
and structuresهِيَ
that areمُخَالِفَةٌ
contrary toلِلْقَوَاعِدِ
the rulesالْمَعْرُوفَةِ
knownفِي
inالْفَنِّ
the discipline(فَهِيَ
(so they areمِنْ
fromقَبِيلِ
the category ofالنَّادِرِ
rareالِاسْتِعْمَالِ).
usage).and often occurred for the early Arabs during their speeches words and structures that are contrary to the rules known in the discipline (so they are from the category of rare usage).
وَلَمَّا
And sinceأَنَّ
thatالْقُرْآنَ
the Quranالْكَرِيمَ
the Nobleنَزَلَ
was revealedبِلُغَةِ
in the language ofالْعَرَبِ
the Arabsالْأَوَّلِينَ،
the early ones,And since the Noble Quran was revealed in the language of the early Arabs,
فَلَا
then there is noعَجَبَ
wonderإِذَا
ifجَاءَتْ
cameفِيهِ
in itالْيَاءُ
the letter ya(لِحَالَةِ
(for the state ofالنَّصْبِ)
nasb)مَكَانَ
in place ofالْوَاوِ
the letter waw(لِحَالَةِ
(for the state ofthen there is no wonder if the letter ya (for the state of nasb) came in it in place of the letter waw (for the state of