Omission of the predicate of Inna, the response of the conditional sentence, and other such things:

And let it be known that the omission of the predicate of Inna

or the omission of the response of the condition

or the object of the verb

or the subject of the sentence

and similar things

when what comes after it

points to it

is consistent in the Wise Quran

and its examples are frequent.

Example of the omission of the object:

His saying - the Most High -:

{And if He had willed, He would have guided you all}

meaning: And if He had willed your guidance, He would have guided you.

Example of the omission of the subject:

His saying - the Most High -:

{The truth is from your Lord}

meaning: This is the truth from your Lord.

Various other examples:

His saying - the Most High -:

{Not equal among you is he who spent before the conquest and fought}

{Those are greater in rank than those who spent afterwards and fought}

the verse, meaning: He who spent before the conquest is not equal

to he who spent after the conquest

so he omitted the second part due to the indication of His saying - the Most High -:

{Those are greater in rank than those who spent afterwards}

{And when it is said to them, Fear what is before you}

{and what is behind you that you may receive mercy (45)}

{And no sign comes to them from the signs of their Lord}

{except that they were from it...}